Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

GESNER in his Nomenclator aquatilium animantium, 1560, gives two figures of the sea-serpent of which I give…

Date of account
Late nineteenth-century survey
Source
The great sea-serpent: an historical and critical treatise
Reference
The great sea-serpent: an historical and critical treatise · selected passage 151
Rights
public_domain
Language
English edition of a European scholarly compilation
Translation
English edition of A. C. Oudemans's historical survey
Record updated
2026-08-24

View the original source ↗

Record summary

GESNER in his Nomenclator aquatilium animantium, 1560, gives two figures of the sea-serpent of which I give facsimiles in Fig

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

GESNER in his _Nomenclator aquatilium animantium_, 1560, gives two figures of the sea-serpent of which I give facsimiles in Fig. 15 and 16.--GESNER says that there is a large map of Scandinavia in OLAUS MAGNUS’ work, and on this map our fig. 15 is drawn in the Baltic Sea, and our fig. 16 in the Atlantic Ocean. In the original edition of 1555 there is but a small map of Scandinavia, which shows only the heads of several animals in the sea. I therefore conclude that there still exists another edition of MAGNUS’ work which I don’t know. Returning to our figures we immediately observe that the drawer has delineated large _snakes_, the one without scales, and swimming with _vertical_ undulations, the other with large scales, and that he did not intend to represent a dorsal fin by the medial line, but only a medial row of scales, unequal to the lateral.

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This is a historical compilation of unusual-animal reports and argument. Witness testimony, repetition between publications and the author's zoological assumptions all affect independence and reliability.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

Lattice compares morphology, behaviour and setting while keeping misidentification, folklore, exaggeration, error and known animals available as alternatives.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.