Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

May 23, 1897 (translated same seance).—Shortly after the beginning of the seance, Hélène, still being awake,…

Date of account
English edition published 1900
Source
From India to the planet Mars: A study of a case of somnambulism with glossolalia
Reference
From India to the planet Mars: A study of a case of somnambulism with glossolalia · selected passage 188
Rights
public_domain
Language
English translation from French
Translation
English translation of Théodore Flournoy
Record updated
2026-08-24

View the original source ↗

Record summary

May 23, 1897 (translated same seance).—Shortly after the beginning of the seance, Hélène, still being awake, has a vision of Astané, who addresses her in these words, which she repeats slowly and in a feeble voice

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

Auditive. May 23, 1897 (translated same seance).—Shortly after the beginning of the seance, Hélène, still being awake, has a vision of Astané, who addresses her in these words, which she repeats slowly and in a feeble voice. I give the text as it was heard and uniformly noted by several sitters, both at the moment of its utterance and at its subsequent translation. Many corrections, however, would be necessary, in order to make it correspond with the later written texts: =ké nipuné ani=, _et ne crains pas_ (“and I am not afraid,” or, “and I do not fear”) should be changed to =kié nipuné ani=, _ne crains pas_ (see text 17); =sé= or =cé= only stands here for _et_, which everywhere else is given as =ni=; =viche= is used in error for =iche= (unless the =v= was added for the sake of euphony, of which there is no other example) and =tis= for =tiche=.

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This comes from historical psychical research. Methods, witness handling and standards of evidence differ from present-day research and should be assessed from the cited passage and edition.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

The passage can support a history of claims and recurring descriptions. It does not establish a paranormal mechanism, and competing psychological, social and physical explanations remain relevant.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.