Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

There was once a great serpent called the Ustû'tli that made its haunt upon Cohutta mountain

Date of account
Material collected chiefly 1887-1890; published 1900
Source
Myths of the Cherokee Extract from the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology
Reference
Myths of the Cherokee Extract from the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology · selected passage 66
Rights
public_domain
Language
English with Cherokee names and material translated from oral testimony
Translation
Collected and edited by James Mooney
Record updated
2026-08-24

View the original source ↗

Record summary

There was once a great serpent called the Ustû'tli that made its haunt upon Cohutta mountain

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

There was once a great serpent called the Ustû'tli that made its haunt upon Cohutta mountain. It was called the Ustû'tli or "foot" snake, because it did not glide like other snakes, but had feet at each end of its body, and moved by strides or jerks, like a great measuring worm. These feet were three-cornered and flat and could hold on to the ground like suckers. It had no legs, but would raise itself up on its hind feet, with its snaky head waving high in the air until it found a good place to take a fresh hold; then it would bend down and grip its front feet to the ground while it drew its body up from behind. It could cross rivers and deep ravines by throwing its head across and getting a grip with its front feet and then swinging its body over. Wherever its footprints were found there was danger. It used to bleat like a young fawn, and when the hunter heard a fawn bleat in the woods he never looked for it, but hurried away in the other direction.

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This material belongs to a folklore tradition. Story type, collector, community, transmission and literary editing matter when comparing it with other sources.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

Lattice compares motifs and reported features without assuming that a traditional being is a biological species or that similar stories document one external cause.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.