Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

R Andrew Lewis, who superintended the building of the fort, became convinced that the Cherokee were really…

Date of account
Material collected chiefly 1887-1890; published 1900
Source
Myths of the Cherokee Extract from the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology
Reference
Myths of the Cherokee Extract from the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology · selected passage 11
Rights
public_domain
Language
English with Cherokee names and material translated from oral testimony
Translation
Collected and edited by James Mooney
Record updated
2026-08-24

View the original source ↗

Record summary

r Andrew Lewis, who superintended the building of the fort, became convinced that the Cherokee were really friendly to the French, and that all their professions of friendship and assistance were "only to put a gloss on their knavery." The fort was finally completed, and, on his suggestion, was garrisoned with a strong…

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

r Andrew Lewis, who superintended the building of the fort, became convinced that the Cherokee were really friendly to the French, and that all their professions of friendship and assistance were "only to put a gloss on their knavery." The fort was finally completed, and, on his suggestion, was garrisoned with a strong force of two hundred men under Captain Demeré. [83] There was strong ground for believing that some depredations committed about this time on the heads of Catawba and Broad rivers, in North Carolina, were the joint work of Cherokee and northern Indians. [84] Notwithstanding all this, a considerable body of Cherokee joined the British forces on the Virginia frontier.

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This material belongs to a folklore tradition. Story type, collector, community, transmission and literary editing matter when comparing it with other sources.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

Lattice compares motifs and reported features without assuming that a traditional being is a biological species or that similar stories document one external cause.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.