Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

In the Râmâyanam,[767] Agamukhî, or goat's face, is called a witch, who wishes Sîtâ to be torn to pieces

Date of account
English edition published 1872
Source
Zoological Mythology; or, The Legends of Animals, Volume 1 (of 2)
Reference
Zoological Mythology; or, The Legends of Animals, Volume 1 (of 2) · selected passage 143
Rights
public_domain
Language
English
Record updated
2026-08-25

View the original source ↗

Record summary

In the Râmâyanam,[767] Agamukhî, or goat's face, is called a witch, who wishes Sîtâ to be torn to pieces

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

In the _Râmâyanam_,[767] Agamukhî, or goat's face, is called a witch, who wishes Sîtâ to be torn to pieces. In the legend of Ilvalas and Vâtâpis,[768] the two wizard brothers who conspire to harm the Brâhmanâs, Vâtâpis transforms himself into a wether, and lets himself be sacrificed in the funeral rites by the Brâhmanâs. The unsuspecting Brâhmanâs eat its flesh; then Ilvalas cries out to his brother, "Come forth, O Vâtâpis!" and his brother, Vâtâpis, comes out of the bodies of the Brâhmanâs, lacerating them, until the rishis Agastyas eats of himself the whole of Vâtâpis, and burns Ilvalas to ashes. The _Râmâyanam_ itself explains to us why, in these sacrifices, a wether, and not a ram, is spoken of,[769] when it narrates the legend of Ahalyâ. It is said in this passage that the god Indras was one day condemned to lose his testicles by the malediction of the rishis Gâutamas, with whose wife, Ahalyâ, he had committed adultery. The gods, moved to pity, took the testicles of a ram and gave them to Indras, who was therefore called Meshândas; on this account, says the _Râmâyanam_, the Pitaras feed on wethers, and not on rams, in funeral oblations. This legend is evidently of brâhmanic origin.

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This material belongs to a folklore tradition. Story type, collector, community, transmission and literary editing matter when comparing it with other sources.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

Lattice compares motifs and reported features without assuming that a traditional being is a biological species or that similar stories document one external cause.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.