Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

Now, it seems plausible to suppose that, by way of analogy, the medium trance would represent a trance state…

Date of account
Published 1921
Source
The Problems of Psychical Research Experiments and Theories in the Realm of the Supernormal
Reference
The Problems of Psychical Research Experiments and Theories in the Realm of the Supernormal · selected passage 21
Rights
public_domain
Language
English
Record updated
2026-08-24

View the original source ↗

Record summary

Now, it seems plausible to suppose that, by way of analogy, the medium trance would represent a trance state induced by hypnotism from the "other side." We know that telepathic hypnotism is a fact--the numerous cases recorded by Myers and Janet being good proof of this

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

Now, it seems plausible to suppose that, by way of analogy, the medium trance would represent a trance state induced by hypnotism _from the "other side."_ We know that telepathic hypnotism is a fact--the numerous cases recorded by Myers and Janet being good proof of this. Further, we know that dreams may be induced experimentally, by means of telepathic suggestion. (See Ermacora's paper, _Proceedings_, xi. 235-308.) Might we not assume, then, that the medium-trance represents a certain condition induced by influence from deceased minds--which would fully account for the supernormal information given (for the medium would be _en rapport_ with these minds), and for the fact that the medium is not usually susceptible to suggestion, pain-tests, &c., on _this_ side. The deeper the trance, the more the medium is in touch with the other world, the less with this; and _vice versa_.

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This comes from historical psychical research. Methods, witness handling and standards of evidence differ from present-day research and should be assessed from the cited passage and edition.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

The passage can support a history of claims and recurring descriptions. It does not establish a paranormal mechanism, and competing psychological, social and physical explanations remain relevant.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.