Skip to content
← Research library

Research source

Here is another argument, which, I think, is very strong, against the hypothesis of telepathy

Date of account
English edition published 1904
Source
Mrs. Piper & the Society for Psychical Research
Reference
Mrs. Piper & the Society for Psychical Research · selected passage 133
Rights
public_domain
Language
English translation from French
Translation
English translation of Michel Sage with an Oliver Lodge preface
Record updated
2026-08-24

View the original source ↗

Record summary

Here is another argument, which, I think, is very strong, against the hypothesis of telepathy

Published source text

Read the available text below. Archive transcriptions may contain OCR errors; later context is labelled separately. A recorded claim is not a finding that it happened.

Source passage

Source text · mention only

Here is another argument, which, I think, is very strong, against the hypothesis of telepathy. Subjects in the hypnotic state, and the secondary personalities which appear in this hypnotic state, according to the precise and decisive experiments made by modern science, have an extremely definite notion of time. If you tell a hypnotised subject to perform an action in a year, at such an hour and minute, he will never fail, so to speak, although when he is awakened there remains in his memory no trace of the order. Now the communicators, in the phenomena we are studying, have an extremely vague notion of time, because, they say, time is not a concept of the world in which they live. How is it that telepathy, which can do so much, owns itself incapable, or nearly so, of determining the moment when an action has been performed?

Historical context

Contextual commentary · mention only

This comes from historical psychical research. Methods, witness handling and standards of evidence differ from present-day research and should be assessed from the cited passage and edition.

Modern context

Contextual commentary · mention only

The passage can support a history of claims and recurring descriptions. It does not establish a paranormal mechanism, and competing psychological, social and physical explanations remain relevant.

Investigate related details with Anomaly Graph’s account-based search, or read how matching and provenance work.